Parliament have gone to recess with a hovering motion of no confidence over the Prime Minister, parliament clusters such
as social and economic cluster are not functional as chairmen’s are ABC affiliated and are preoccupied with
ABC issues. For instance, letters from Factory workers and issues regarding teachers have been stalling in such
clusters. On the other hand, the executive is also seized ABC cases thus thwarting general operation of the
Executive. BNP internal issues are a threat as well since it has followed the trend of submitting cases in court
Manifestation of the problems
Threat to reforms – it was stated in the 38th SADC Summit Communique that an act that frustrate
the implementation of reforms shall be penalised.
Violation of fundamental human rights- e.g long detentions.
Poor service delivery; police stations without electricity, shortage of petrol for government vehicles.
Labour implications; Foreign Investors fear of instability within the government has affected
business e.g. Unfounded retrenchments and/or lay-offs in the textile industry, pulling out of
international investors and donors, lay-offs, strikes, low remuneration.
Threats to pillars of democracy and the rule of law.
Development (economy), issues of wool and mohair, Economic projects are likely to stall e.g threats
from the US embassy to pull out the MCA project
Security of the country is threatened
There is no ownership of reforms by civil society organisation since there is a small representation
and/or none at all. For instance, structures aimed at advancing reform progress there is no
representation of Civil society or consultation thereof.
Education quota on students to be sponsored threatens the right to education.
Government failure to increase the subversion on education institutions results in institutions refusal
in bargaining to decrease fees.
The delay to effect the 6% increase for police officers threatens service delivery.
Political Party lineage used for allocation of jobs as a result of patronage.
Implementation of reforms by all leaders notably political parties beyond lip service; there is a need for
commitment and political will. For instance, there should be deadlines, reports on allocation and use of
money and accountability on the actors
Transitional Government and Government of National Unity is not a solution as it vetoes the system of
checks and balances and serves the interest of political leaders at the expense of ordinary citizens.
Appeal to ABC party to work within the confines of law-where there is a court order they should respect
it and avoid contempt of court.
Political Party Cases should not be prioritised, justice system and all people should hold sanctity of
The judiciary should be maintained in a manner does not leave a shadow of doubt that their judgement
is influenced by ultra-judicial issues.
Collaboration with other stakeholders
Appeal for Separation of powers
Education issues should be prioritised
There should be Stability within the coalition government parties; they should avoid to defy their
constitutions and negotiate for peace and stability.
A Press Conference was held at DPE premises on Tuesday 16th July 2019 for the media.
For further information please contact:
Lebohang Leeu (Adv.)
Demogracy and Human Rights Commission Coordinator
Lesotho Council of NGOs
Tel: +266 22317205
Mobile: +266 59598166
Development is impossible in the absence of true democracy, respect for human rights, peace and good governance.
Good governance and human rights are mutually reinforcing. In turn good governance and participation are
essential aspects of democracy and for achieving democracy of a freely functioning, well organised, vibrant society
and responsible civil society is indispensable. Democracy presupposes amidst others functioning political parties
and an active civil society that can primarily monitor the way states honour social protection contract with their
citizenry and hold government accountable. Human rights are better promoted and protected in a democratic system
and Lesotho system does not pose as democratic. Accordingly, measures taken by government that undermines key
elements of good governance, tends to undermine the protection and promotion of human rights. Therefore, civil
society should be seen exerting pressure on decision makers to observe the core values of democracy and human
rights and not be subjected to hostile attitude and viewed as antagonistic predisposed to undermine efforts in
providing social protection.
For the past 28 years, The Lesotho Council of Non-Government Organizations (LCN) as an umbrella body for Civil
Society Organisations in Lesotho, established with the purpose of providing the supportive services to the NGO
community through networking, leadership, information dissemination, capacity building, coordination, advocacy
and lobbying, and representation when dealing with the international community and government, has been
promoting awareness and observation of human rights, good governance, as well as promote accountability, civil
legal reform and representation, community development and conflict management. LCN mission is to stimulate,
promotes and build capacity within Lesotho NGOs so that they are stable, democratic, transparent, skilled,
empowered, sustainable and responsive to their beneficiary’s needs and those of the voiceless and marginalised.
LCN believes in true principles of democracy and intervene when those practicing it go beyond the perimeters and
affect right of others in a manner that warrants our intervention as is the case currently within the three arms of
Interdependence of The 3 Arms of State
The division of powers among three distinct but interdependent branches of Legislature, Executive and the
Judiciary is a defining feature of Lesotho governmental system. The Constitution of Lesotho denotes this
division. However, interdependence is brought upon by the system of checks and balances These branches are
supposedly autonomous and should not be seen as hierarchical. However, this system provides ample
opportunity for interbranch conflict and the notion of separation of powers is totally blurred. Separation of
powers have been adopted to preclude the exercise of arbitrary use of powers however disputes of this nature
have continued to occupy a central place of public concern. For instance, Judiciary is defined as part of
government but independent so that courts can protect citizens without being influenced or pressurised by
government. The independence of judiciary is a cornerstone of constitutional democracy. It guarantees the
supremacy of the constitution. Notable incidences have been those of appointment and impeachment of judges
by Prime Minister, contempt of court orders, interference of the functioning of the judiciary invalidating this
doctrine and appoint judges by Prime Minister to name a few. Courts have failed to articulate consistent
methodology for analysing separation of powers. The inconsistencies are depicted in the preposterous outcomes
on cases brought before court. This Constitutional turf battle has undesirable consequences for the nation as a
whole. The people have lost faith in the justice system. Our courts fail to live up to the old adage that justice
must not only be heard but must be seen to be done. The relationship between the High Court and the Court of Appeal;
in some instances, the latter is seen usurping the powers of the former. Also the conduct of the President of the
Court of Appeal and Acting Chief Justice in handling of cases. There is a lot of interference of the
Executive (Prime Minister) in the Judiciary.
Shrinking Political SpaceMeasure taken by government to prevent key role players in protecting
and promoting human rights provides a polarised environment to uphold democracy. The current situation is
seen to curtail the civil society role ofmonitoring social protection principle and holding the government
accountable. Any initiative taken is labelled as being politically affiliated and/or being influenced by
factions of the dismantled major party within the coalition government. Civil society is not going to shy
away from pointing out where powers exercised did not act in the best interest of the general populace for
fear of being antagonistic and being labelled.
Divisions within the All Basotho Convention Party(ABC) and Looming Di visions within the BNP
Divisions within the ABC has posed a threat to peace and stability. The result of the squabble for power within
this party has also spread on the administration of the country as whole. Government shifting responsibility to
party issues; issues regarding the party has remained top priority neglecting the development of the country.
For instance, cases involving ABC are priorities within the judiciary resulting in a deadlock of cases;